Skip to content
HighOnCity Montréal
NEWS

Éditions du Boréal steps back from defending Thélyson Orélien amid AI and plagiarism questions

Publisher shifts from unwavering support to cautious neutrality as allegations mount over novelist's manuscript and earlier published work.

· 2 min read · HOC Montréal Desk
Éditions du Boréal steps back from defending Thélyson Orélien amid AI and plagiarism questions
★ FREE NEWSLETTER
Get the best of Greater Montréal in your inbox

The day's top stories, food & events — every morning at 7. Unsubscribe anytime.

Éditions du Boréal is no longer defending Thélyson Orélien against allegations he used AI to write his novel or plagiarized earlier work. Instead, the publisher is calling for caution—proposing readers focus on the substance of the text rather than the machine's role in its creation.

Renaud Roussel, co-director general of Éditions du Boréal, said Saturday: "Our position right now is not to make a decision." His tone marks a sharp shift from the publisher's initial statement responding to the accusations. The editorial team, Roussel said, moved from "disbelief" to "worry… for the author above all" as the scandal unfolded.

Orélien, 38, was on a promotional tour in France without a Boréal representative when the allegations broke, leaving him to face media pressure alone. Roussel wants to give Orélien time to demonstrate his manuscript writing process before the publisher decides whether to stand by the book.

Yet plagiarism allegations predate the AI controversy. La Presse observed that many texts attributed to Orélien between 2012 and 2014—published in Quebec and French media—are identical in all respects to existing publications or works by other authors. Roussel said those cases "do not concern the text published by Éditions du Boréal" and condemned all forms of plagiarism.

Roussel also pushed back on the notion that editors should investigate: "It's not for editors to dig to disprove or confirm the allegations. We are not investigators or journalists." Instead, he framed the crisis as unprecedented and called for reliable conclusions before any final judgment.

The Boréal team received the manuscript on September 12, 2025, and printed it on January 27, 2026. Roussel described it as "very high-quality" and noted it "immediately engaged us." The publisher is not worried for its own reputation—Éditions du Boréal is marking its 63rd anniversary—but the case will influence how the book world handles similar allegations going forward.

What we asked

Will Orélien be given a public opportunity to demonstrate his writing process, and on what timeline?

What specific plagiarism findings, if any, will Boréal formally acknowledge beyond those La Presse observed?

Will the publisher ultimately withdraw or retain the book in print?

We'll update this story as answers emerge.

The facts

What is Éditions du Boréal's current position on the allegations against Thélyson Orélien?

Éditions du Boréal is no longer defending Orélien but has adopted a cautious neutral stance, calling for readers to focus on the substance of the text rather than the machine's role in its creation. Co-director general Renaud Roussel stated the publisher's position is 'not to make a decision' until Orélien demonstrates his manuscript writing process.

When did Éditions du Boréal receive and print Orélien's manuscript?

Éditions du Boréal received the manuscript on September 12, 2025, and printed it on January 27, 2026.

What earlier plagiarism allegations preceded the AI controversy?

La Presse found that many texts attributed to Orélien between 2012 and 2014, published in Quebec and French media, were identical to existing publications or works by other authors. Roussel said these cases do not concern the text published by Éditions du Boréal.