Skip to content
HighOnCity Montréal
NEWS

Parti Québécois plan to extend Bill 101 to CEGEPs sparks fierce pushback from colleges

The PQ's election promise would force French-language CEGEPs on all eligible students. Dawson College says it would cut enrollment nearly in half and trigger layoffs.

· 3 min read · HOC Montréal Desk
Parti Québécois plan to extend Bill 101 to CEGEPs sparks fierce pushback from colleges
File photo: Mikhail Nilov / Pexels
★ FREE NEWSLETTER
Get the best of Greater Montréal in your inbox

The day's top stories, food & events — every morning at 7. Unsubscribe anytime.

The Parti Québécois announced during the Quebec election campaign that it would extend Bill 101 to CEGEPs, forcing students who attended French elementary and high schools to study at French-language colleges rather than choosing an English institution.

The party's leader, Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, said the measure would result in 9,850 additional students graduating from college in French. "CEGEP students are at the age where their cultural and linguistic choices solidify, and it is crucial that they choose French," he said.

The proposal drew immediate opposition from anglophone institutions and education bodies. Toby Harper-Merrett, director general of Dawson College, called it catastrophic. "It would cut our eligible student population nearly in half perhaps. It would cause the layoff of hundreds and hundreds of faculty and staff."

Rama Kosara, president of the Dawson Student Union, argued the change would harm how students view French culture in Quebec. "Removing the choice that students have on their higher education will do nothing but harm," she said. Ezra-Pierre Boucrot, a Dawson student, emphasized the importance of choice at a formative point in education. "It's very important like the start of almost your career. You're choosing what you want to do in the future and you should have the choice of what language you want to study."

The Fédération des cégeps, which represents the colleges, acknowledged the goal of strengthening French but said applying Bill 101 eligibility rules to the college level was not the right approach. The federation noted that CEGEP has historically been based on free choice of language instruction. "Any questioning of this principle raises significant issues, particularly regarding accessibility, individual rights, and consistency between the governance of colleges and universities," the statement said.

Charles Milliard, leader of the Quebec Liberal Party, said the measure treats young adults as if they lack agency. "I think that young adults are actually adults in CEGEP and this is not the way we want to promote and protect French."

Marie-Anne Alepin, president of the Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Montréal, supported the PQ's position, arguing that Bill 101 should also be examined at the university level. The Société said the measures were necessary to protect French as Quebec's common language.

What we asked

How many anglophone students currently attend English-language CEGEPs in Quebec, and by how much would enrollment drop under the proposed change?

What safeguards or exemptions, if any, would apply to non-francophone students or international applicants under Bill 101 extension?

We'll update this story as answers emerge.

The facts

What would the Parti Québécois proposal do to CEGEP enrollment?

The proposal would extend Bill 101 to CEGEPs, forcing students who attended French elementary and high schools to study at French-language colleges. Dawson College estimates it would cut the eligible student population nearly in half and cause layoffs of hundreds of faculty and staff.

How many additional French-language college graduates does the PQ expect from this plan?

The Parti Québécois leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon said the measure would result in 9,850 additional students graduating from college in French.

What is the main concern from the Fédération des cégeps?

The Fédération des cégeps acknowledged the goal of strengthening French but said that extending Bill 101 to colleges contradicts the historical principle of free choice of language instruction and raises significant issues regarding accessibility and individual rights.